Ed Sheeran’s most recent song video is full of gown changes, film references — oh, and Travis Scott.
On Friday, the 28-yr-vintage singer and Scott dropped their music video for “Antisocial,” one of the tracks on Sheeran’s new album, No.6 Collaborations Project. The album, launched on Friday, features Sheeran’s collaborations with artists like Scott, Justin Bieber, and more significant.
“Check out my video for the next unmarried, ‘Antisocial’ with @travisscott, become so fun taking pictures this,” Sheeran wrote on Instagram on Friday. “Can you see the movie references?”
The clip, which indicates Sheeran dressed up as a sea captain and an office employee, amongst other roles, features references to films including Pulp Fiction and Edward Scissorhands.
No.6 Collaborations Project consists of Sheeran’s collaborations with Bruno Mars, Chance the Rapper, Cardi B, Camila Cabello, Khalid, Eminem, 50 Cent, Meek Mill, and Skrillex.
“Thanks to all of the high-quality artists I’ve labored with on this document for sharing your talent with me,” Sheeran wrote on Instagram closing month.
The musician formerly launched the music movies for his damage hit with Bieber titled “I Don’t Care” and “Beautiful People,” his duet with Khalid.
On Friday, Sheeran also confirmed he had tied the knot with longtime love Cherry Seaborn at some point in a brand new interview with Charlamagne Tha God.
When requested approximately his extra personal lyrics at the track “Remember the Name,” proposing Eminem and 50 Cent, Sheeran referenced the verse that says, “Watch how the lyrics in the songs might get twisted / My spouse wears purple but looks better without the lipstick.”
“It becomes surely earlier than Cherry, and I got married, and I knew that we’d be married by the point that the tune came out,” said Sheeran. “[I thought] Someone’s gonna pay attention that and be like, ‘Oh, they’re married!’ I didn’t recognize how that might be construed, however manifestly, it’s already popped out.”
When I got here throughout this newsletter, I turned into bowled over on the expenses those works of art have to reap. Several of them might hardly evoke an effective emotional response in me. In contrast, others may be most uncomplicated barely, however for nearly all of them, I honestly do not understand how their charges are pondered inside the work, and vice versa. These pieces had been not supposed for people like me, an artist, while wealthy consumers honestly see their intrinsic creative value.
So why doesn’t the song attract those forms of charges? Is it even feasible for a chunk of recorded music, no longer tune memorabilia or a track artifact (which includes an unprecedented report, LP, bootleg, T-shirt, album artwork, and so on.), to be well worth $1 million or more? Are all musicians and tune composers doomed to struggle within the track industry and claw their manner up right into a profession in music? If one portrays can be worth $1 million, why can’t a tune or piece of music also be valued? The $.Ninety-nine in step with download rate is the best price a track can command at a market fee, irrespective of its high-quality or content, and the musician or composer has to receive this cost.