One morning, some months ago, I saw a headline that sank my coronary heart. It claimed that eggs could give you heart attacks.
It wasn’t that I was about to eat eggs for breakfast. It was because, as a scientific journalist, I knew friends and family might soon ask me what to make of this declaration. And I might have a tough time answering. Advice about what to eat seems to exchange every week.
Eggs are a classic example. They were once seen as wholesome sources of protein and vitamins, a perfect start to the day. But in the 1960s, we were awakened to the dangers of cholesterol. Eggs rich in this fatty substance have become frowned upon.
But wait! Around two decades ago, our thoughts about cholesterol were revised: the amount of cholesterol in our meals now did not matter, as it didn’t affect the tiers in our blood and our heart fitness. In the observed years, it has become OK to devour eggs another time. Then, in March, the state-of-the-art examination showed the other again – that LDL cholesterol in eggs changed into bad for us.
Sometimes, I am surprised if we should believe whatever we read about meals. That might sound like an overreaction; however, perhaps it is a rational stance. A developing variety of scientists are now pronouncing vitamin technology as so mistaken that we will even believe pillars of recommendation like consuming masses of vegetables and warding off saturated fats. Within sure common-sense boundaries, they are saying; it doesn’t count what we devour. But ought to tha